Compare
A Frame.io alternative for AI provenance and handoff
Frame.io is excellent for video review and approval. BTW is the provenance layer around the AI work, keeping the recipe and the decisions behind each shot. Here is how they compare, feature by feature.
In short
A review tool, and a provenance layer
Frame.io is excellent at what it is built for: video review and client approval, with frame-accurate comments, version stacking and a polished sign-off flow. That is a different job from AI provenance. BTW keeps the prompt, model, references and version decisions behind each AI asset, so the record of how the work was made is ready when someone asks. Many teams run a review tool and BTW side by side.
Feature by feature
BTW next to Frame.io
Each row is a concrete capability you can check. The left column is what BTW does; the right is Frame.io, with credit where it is due.
Capability
BTW
Frame.io
- Prompt, model and seed captured
BTW
The prompt, model and seed arrive attached to the asset through the browser extension, so the recipe is captured rather than retyped.
Frame.io
Frame.io centers on the media file and its review, so the generation recipe such as prompt, model and seed does not have a dedicated home there.
- Version lineage kept
BTW
Every version stays linked to its shot in the order it was made, on the workflow canvas.
Frame.io
Frame.io stacks versions of a file for review and side-by-side comparison, which it does well.
- Hold, kill or final decision recorded
BTW
You set one version as final and mark the rest held or killed, and that decision stays on the shot.
Frame.io
Frame.io records a review status such as approved or needs changes on each asset.
- References and rights status
BTW
Reference images attach to the shot with their rights status recorded next to them.
Frame.io
The reference images behind a generation and their rights status are not what a review tool is built to hold.
- EU AI Act documentation
BTW
The prompt, model, references and decision behind each shot are documented by default, which is what Article 50 of the EU AI Act asks for from 2 August 2026.
Frame.io
Frame.io documents review and approval rather than how an asset was generated, so an AI generation record is not part of it.
- One-click client handoff
BTW
You hand off the final in one click with its whole record attached: prompt, model, references, decision, author and time.
Frame.io
Frame.io share links are built for review and sign-off, so the generation recipe is not part of what travels with them.
- Search across prompts
BTW
Search runs across the prompts and records of every asset, across the tools you generated in.
Frame.io
Search covers file names, comments and metadata, since prompts are not captured to search across.
- Works on top of your existing AI tools
BTW
BTW sits above the AI tools you already use and captures from them, rather than replacing any of them.
Frame.io
Frame.io connects to editing and post tools and holds the media you upload to it.
The honest part
When Frame.io is the right choice
If your core need is getting a cut reviewed and approved, Frame.io is outstanding at exactly that, and BTW does not replace it. BTW is for the layer before and around review: capturing how each AI asset was generated and holding the decisions behind it. The common setup is to use a review tool for approval and BTW for provenance, each doing the job it is built for.
FAQ
BTW and Frame.io, answered
- Is BTW a Frame.io alternative?
- It depends on the job. For video review and client approval, Frame.io is purpose-built and BTW does not replace it. If what you need is a record of how each AI asset was made, with the prompt, model, references and version decisions, that is what BTW is built for. Many teams use both: a review tool for sign-off and BTW for provenance.
- Can BTW handle version review like Frame.io?
- BTW keeps every version of a shot linked in the order it was made, along with the decision to hold, kill or finalise each one, which is version history for provenance. Frame.io is built around frame-accurate review comments and a formal approval flow for media. If your priority is structured review and sign-off, a review tool is the better fit; if it is the recipe and the decisions behind each AI asset, BTW is.
- Does BTW produce EU AI Act documentation?
- Yes. Under Article 50 of the EU AI Act, transparency and documentation duties for AI-generated content begin on 2 August 2026. BTW records the prompt, model, references and decision behind each shot by default, so that documentation is produced as part of your normal workflow.
Get started
Stop rebuilding work your team already did.
Set up your first project in about two minutes. From day one, every asset, prompt, reference and decision stays findable.